According to a recent discussion among election officials, there is ongoing debate over whether a formal election certificate should include the abbreviation “A.D.” Some argue that including this abbreviation, which stands for “Anno Domini” or “in the year of our Lord,” is unnecessary and could potentially alienate non-Christian voters. Others believe that the use of “A.D.” is traditional and should be maintained for the sake of historical accuracy and cultural significance.
The issue came to light when a local election official in a small town raised concerns about whether including “A.D.” on an election certificate was appropriate in today’s diverse and multi-faith society. The official suggested using a more neutral abbreviation such as “C.E.” (Common Era) instead of “A.D.” to avoid any potential controversy or offense.
Those in favor of keeping “A.D.” on the election certificate argue that it is a longstanding tradition in Western society and should not be abandoned simply to cater to a small minority of voters. They also point out that the use of “A.D.” is not meant to endorse any specific religion but rather to denote the historical timeline based on the birth of Jesus Christ, a widely accepted chronological marker.
Ultimately, the decision on whether to include “A.D.” on formal election certificates will likely vary depending on the jurisdiction and the preferences of the individuals involved. Some may choose to stick with tradition and uphold the use of “A.D.,” while others may opt for a more inclusive approach by using “C.E.” or another neutral abbreviation.
As election officials continue to grapple with this issue, it serves as a reminder of the importance of respecting different cultural and religious beliefs while also upholding longstanding traditions and practices. The debate over “A.D.” on election certificates highlights the delicate balance between tradition and inclusivity in a diverse society.
Source
Photo credit www.kansascity.com