The Supreme Court rejected President-elect Donald Trump’s request to block criminal proceedings in his hush money case, allowing a sentencing hearing to proceed. The 5-4 decision marked a reversal for the conservative-majority court, with Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining the liberal justices. Trump criticized the case and expressed plans to appeal. His lawyers argued for presidential immunity, but the court ruled that certain official acts can be subject to prosecution. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg urged the court not to intervene, emphasizing the public interest in proceeding with the sentencing. Trump was convicted of falsifying records related to hush money paid to Stormy Daniels. The court’s rulings have helped Trump navigate legal challenges and clear the path for his return to office. Despite criticism, Trump remains determined to appeal the case. The Supreme Court’s decision has significant implications for the future of the presidency and the legal obligations of high-ranking officials.
Photo credit
www.nbcnews.com
The Supreme Court refuses to intervene in Trump sentencing for hush money case
Previous article![]( "Tune in to Rock Chalk Sports Talk for the latest on KU men’s basketball and beyond")
Next article![]( "U.S. Senate shows strong bipartisan support for bill expanding immigration detention, advancing it in the legislative process")
