Amendment 7, a proposed measure on the ballot, has raised concerns due to its inclusion of language regarding banning non-citizen voting, which is already illegal. The amendment also addresses policies such as ranked-choice voting and open primaries.
Despite the fact that non-citizen voting is already prohibited by current laws, the inclusion of this language in Amendment 7 has sparked debate among voters. Some argue that this provision is unnecessary and may lead to confusion, while others believe it serves as a symbolic statement of the state’s stance on the issue.
In addition to the controversial non-citizen voting provision, Amendment 7 also proposes the implementation of ranked-choice voting and open primaries. Ranked-choice voting allows voters to rank candidates in order of preference, and the candidate with the majority of first-choice votes is declared the winner. Open primaries would allow voters to participate in primary elections regardless of their party affiliation.
Supporters of ranked-choice voting and open primaries argue that these policies enhance democracy by giving voters more choice and encouraging candidates to appeal to a wider audience. However, critics raise concerns about the potential for increased complexity and confusion in the voting process.
As voters consider the implications of Amendment 7, they must weigh the potential benefits of ranked-choice voting and open primaries against the controversy surrounding the non-citizen voting provision. Ultimately, the decision on whether to approve this amendment will shape the future of elections in the state.
Source
Photo credit www.kansascity.com